Find what you're looking for in your city

On Monday, as the clock approached midnight, all eyes in Ohio's Capitol were fixed on Governor Mike DeWine's desk. Armed with veto power, DeWine was preparing to sign off on the state's $60 billion budget, which critics say threatens to undermine children's well-being, restrict local government authority, and weaken social services. This budget, passed by the Republican majority after tense negotiations, contains provisions that contradict DeWine's longstanding priorities — protecting youth, ensuring access to medical services, and maintaining local autonomy. On Tuesday, July 1st, the governor will hold a press conference to explain his decisions, but sources close to the administration hint that his pen is already poised to veto several contentious items that could reshape Ohio's social landscape. The Battle for Priorities The budget, known as House Bill 96, is a complex 5,500-page document proposing $1.1 billion in tax cuts, including a shift to a single personal income tax rate of 2.75%, as well as $600 million from unspent funds toward supporting the new Cleveland Browns stadium in Brook Park. But beneath the shine of tax breaks and mega-projects lie provisions raising concerns among Democrats, educators, and even some Republicans. "Unfortunately, there are many points that will cause real harm to Ohio residents," said State Representative Bride Rose Sweeney, a Democrat from Westlake, in an interview ahead of the deadline. She and her colleagues urged DeWine to exercise his veto to protect vulnerable populations. DeWine, known for his moderate Republican stance and focus on child welfare, has repeatedly demonstrated a willingness to oppose his own party. In 2023, he vetoed 44 bills, including restrictions on local bans on flavored tobacco products and vaccination requirements at universities, citing public health and local autonomy concerns. This year's focus will likely remain unchanged, with particular attention to children, healthcare, and supporting local communities. "This is a budget for our children," DeWine said on February 3, when presenting his initial proposal of $218 billion, which included a $1,000 child tax credit and full funding for the Cupp-Patterson school funding formula. However, many of his initiatives, including the tax credit, were cut by House Republicans, causing his disappointment. Key Veto Targets Among provisions likely to face DeWine’s veto are restrictions on Medicaid access for children aged 0 to 3, which could leave thousands of families without medical coverage. According to Ohio Department of Medicaid data, in 2024, the program served the healthcare needs of 55,000 newborns, half of whom were from low-income families. Cuts to lead poisoning prevention programs — a measure disproportionately impacting children in urban areas like Cleveland and Youngstown — also raise alarms. In 2023, Ohio recorded 4,300 cases of lead poisoning in children, and DeWine previously called for strengthening prevention programs. Another likely vetoed provision is the elimination of the Advisory Council on Rare Disease Treatment. Created to coordinate care for patients with conditions such as cystic fibrosis, this council was a key element of DeWine's strategy to improve the state's healthcare system. Additionally, the budget cuts funding for mental health programs, including those for LGBTQ+ youth, contradicting the governor’s previous actions in 2023 when he vetoed a ban on gender-affirming medical care for minors, calling it a "lifesaver." Restrictions on the H2Ohio program, DeWine’s signature water cleanup initiative, may also be vetoed. The budget reduces funding from the $270 million proposed by the governor to $165 million, threatening efforts to protect Lake Erie from algae pollution. "Clean water is fundamental to our state," DeWine emphasized in June, expressing concern over the cuts. According to Ohio Environmental Protection Agency data, since 2019, H2Ohio has helped reduce phosphorus runoff by 30%, contributing to improved water quality in the Lake Erie Western Basin. The provision requiring libraries to isolate books relating to "sexual orientation or gender" also sparked widespread backlash. Librarians like Emily Strong of the Cayuga Public Library warn this could lead to censorship, even of children's books featuring female characters. "This is absurd," Strong said. "Libraries are community hearts, not battlegrounds for ideology." DeWine, who has repeatedly emphasized the importance of libraries in children's education, called this provision "problematic" and is likely to veto it. Local Governance and Education Under Threat One of the most controversial points is the restriction on school districts' savings to 40% of their annual budgets, requiring surpluses to be returned to taxpayers. Senate President Rob McColly said this aims to ensure "transparency" in school finance, but critics, including eight of Ohio’s largest school districts, argue it could lead to program cuts in cities like Columbus and Cincinnati. "We respect local communities in managing schools," DeWine said on June 28, hinting that this provision may be revoked to preserve financial flexibility for schools. The budget also limits local governments' ability to put emergency taxes to vote or increase existing taxes, which Sweeney says "handcuffs" municipalities. With local autonomy historically strong in Ohio, these restrictions prompted protests outside the Capitol when lawmakers voted on the budget on June 26. DeWine, who vetoed similar attempts to restrict local tobacco bans in 2023, is expected to defend municipalities. Political and Social Context DeWine’s veto actions will impact not only Ohio but also his legacy as governor, whose second term ends in 2026. His moderate stance, often at odds with the more radical elements of the Republican Party, has received both praise and criticism. Advocates like the American Cancer Society applauded his past vetoes on tobacco laws, while conservative lawmakers, such as Speaker Hoffman, expressed disappointment in his opposition to party initiatives. On the other hand, Democrats, while supporting his focus on children, criticize him for not going further in vetoing the expansion of school vouchers in 2023, which, according to Ohio Education Association data, diverted $1.2 billion from public schools. Funding for the Cleveland Browns stadium, which includes $600 million from unspent funds, is another point of tension. Though DeWine expressed cautious support for this approach compared to bond financing, two former Democratic legislators threaten legal action, claiming it violates state priorities. "This is not what our children or communities need," Sweeney said, echoing the sentiments of protesters. Looking Ahead As DeWine prepares to exercise his vetoes, Ohio stands at a crossroads. The budget, if left unchanged, could weaken social services, curtail local autonomy, and hinder progress in key areas like education and health care. But with veto power in hand, the governor has the opportunity to steer course, strengthening his reputation as a defender of children and communities. His decisions, to be announced at the July 1 press conference, will shape Ohio’s fiscal landscape for 2026–2027 and set the tone of political discourse in a state where ideological battles are intensifying. For Ohio residents like librarian Strong or families relying on Medicaid, these vetoes are more than political maneuvers — they are matters of survival. In a state proud of its resilience, DeWine has the chance to prove that Ohio remains a place where children, communities, and justice come first.

COLUMBUS, Ohio — As Congress approaches the July 4th deadline to pass President Donald Trump's "Great Big Beautiful Bill," the Republicans' proposed cut of $300 billion from the SNAP program — the largest in history — threaten to leave millions of Ohio residents without access to food. State food bank leaders are raising alarms, warning that these changes, which shift significant costs onto the states, could undermine the food security system, especially for children, seniors, and low-income families. In a state where every ninth resident depends on SNAP, rates cannot go higher. The proposal, introduced by Senate Agriculture Committee Chair John Boozman (R-Arkansas), envisions a radical restructuring of the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), known as "food stamps." It compels states to pay between 5% and 25% of benefit costs depending on error rates in calculations, and increases their share of administrative costs from 50% to 75%. According to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, this could mean additional costs for Ohio ranging from $158 million to $790 million annually, depending on the error rate, which stood at 15% in 2023, resulting in an additional burden of $473 million. "This isn't about fraud," said Jorie Novotni, Executive Director of the Ohio Food Bank Association, during an interview in Columbus. "It's about errors by overwhelmed staff and outdated systems that we can't afford to fix without federal funding." These cuts are part of a broader Republican strategy to fund $4.6 trillion in tax cuts, which, according to analysis by the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania, benefits the wealthiest 10% of the population with 70% of the gains. Meanwhile, as Novotni emphasizes, Ohio's SNAP system, which provides debit cards for food purchases to families with incomes below $32,150 a year for a family of four, is already operating at the limit. The average benefit — $6.28 per person per day — barely covers basic needs, and extended delays in processing applications, sometimes lasting two or three hours, only make the situation worse. "Every child deserves food," Novotni said, speaking to congressional aides of Ohio Senators Bernie Moreno and J.D. Vance in Washington. "We can't allow political maneuvering to leave them hungry." System on the brink of collapse The proposed changes, included in the budget reconciliation package, threaten to overload Ohio's already strained social services system. Increasing administrative burden by 50% will complicate every step — from application submission to six-month income reviews. Novotni notes that current tolerance for small calculation errors ($57) will be eliminated, sharply increasing error rates and thus financial strain on the state. "We're talking about millions of transactions," she explained. "Even one dollar mistake can cost Ohio hundreds of millions." The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities warns that in the worst-case scenario, states unable to cover these costs could entirely suspend participation in SNAP, leaving 1.3 million Ohio residents, including 400,000 children, without food assistance. Food banks, which already serve three times as many people as before the pandemic, will be unable to fill this gap. Jamie Trout, Executive Director of Eastside Community Ministry in Zanesville, said her organization in Muskingum County is already struggling with rising food prices and tripled attendance over the past three years. "If SNAP is cut, we won't withstand the surge," she said. "Our shelves will be empty." In 2022, one-third of SNAP participants in Ohio were children, and another 250,000 were seniors, highlighting how vulnerable groups will be impacted by these changes. Political and moral challenge Republicans, including Boozman, claim that their approach is "common sense," aimed at increasing efficiency and accountability. However, Minnesota Senator Amy Klobuchar, the leading Democrat on the committee, called the proposal "shameful," warning that it "will leave more children, seniors, and veterans hungry." The Senate plan failed when member Elizabeth McDonough ruled that the requirement for states to cover part of SNAP payments violates budget rules, forcing Republicans to look for alternative ways to fund tax cuts. Nonetheless, the provision to shift 75% of administrative costs onto states remains, which, according to estimates, will cost Ohio $27 billion by 2034. Anti-hunger advocates like Michael Young, pastor and board member of the Mid-Ohio Food Collective, describe these changes as a moral failure. "We are the richest nation in the world," he said. "Feeding people shouldn't be difficult. It's our responsibility." Research shows that SNAP not only reduces food insecurity but also improves health, education, and economic outcomes, lowering healthcare costs. However, the proposal to freeze the update to the Thrifty Food Plan, which determines benefit amounts, could cut benefits by $30 billion by 2034, forcing families to buy less food amidst rising prices. Ohio's reaction and next steps This Tuesday, Novotni met with aides to Senators Moreno and Vance in Washington, trying to persuade them to oppose cuts. Neither senator is a member of the Agriculture Committee, but their influence in the Senate, where Republicans hold 53 seats, could be decisive. She called for a more transparent approach to SNAP reforms, emphasizing that "structural changes of this scale require careful discussion." Meanwhile, the fight in Congress continues over which provisions will remain in the final bill, expected to be passed before Independence Day. In Ohio, local leaders from both parties support House Bill 178, which proposes additional SNAP benefits for seniors receiving less than $50 per month. Still, these efforts may be overshadowed if federal reductions go into effect. Governor Mike DeWine, who previously vetoed 44 provisions in the 2023 budget, could play a key role if the Senate approves the package. His position on SNAP remains unclear, but sources in Columbus suggest he may oppose the harshest cuts given their impact on vulnerable populations. For a state where food banks are already stretched to the limit and 400,000 children rely on SNAP, these changes are not just budget issues but matters of survival. "We can't allow our neighbors to go hungry while the wealthy get tax breaks," Novotni said, standing before a Mid-Ohio Food Collective warehouse filled with boxes of food. As the clock ticks toward the deadline, Ohio faces a choice: protect its most vulnerable or sacrifice them for political priorities in Washington.

COLUMBUS, Ohio — On Wednesday, June 25, 2025, the Republican majority in Ohio approved an ambitious two-year budget of $60 billion, which, according to them, will strengthen the state's economic competitiveness. However, the bill, passed in the dead of night behind closed doors in the conference committee, has sparked a wave of criticism from Democrats, who call it a “billionaire's budget” that ignores the needs of workers, education, and vulnerable groups. From generous funding for the new Cleveland Browns stadium to restrictions on LGBT books and transgender health care, this budget has become an arena for ideological battles that could determine the future of the state ahead of Governor Mike DeWine's signing.Passed in the House of Representatives (59-38) and the Senate (23-10), the budget, known as House Bill 96, received no Democrat votes — the first time since 2001. “This is not a budget for Ohioans,” declared Braed Rose Swiny, the leading Democrat on the House Finance Committee, accusing Republicans of prioritizing the wealthy and sports magnates over children and workers. Five Republicans in the House and one in the Senate joined Democrats in voting against, signaling rare cracks in party unity.Tax breaks for the wealthy, cuts to social programsThe central element of the budget is the switch to a flat income tax rate of 2.75%, eliminating the progressive rate of 3.5% for earners over $100,000. According to Policy Matters Ohio, this change will benefit predominantly the wealthiest 20% of residents by $1.1 billion, while the lower class will see no change. “Librarians and teachers will pay the same tax as professional athletes and corporate executives,” noted Bailey Williams of Policy Matters Ohio. To offset revenue losses, lawmakers cut funding for social programs, including Medicaid and children's medical initiatives, raising concerns about access to medical services for 3 million low-income Ohio residents.Cleveland Browns receive $600 millionOne of the most controversial provisions is allocating $600 million from the state's unclaimed funds to build the new Cleveland Browns stadium in Bruck Park. Unlike the House proposal, which envisioned a $1 billion bond loan with interest, the Senate chose a direct grant, using $4.8 billion of unclaimed funds — from forgotten bank accounts to unused deposits. “This is not debt; it’s cash,” said Senator Jerry Searino, claiming it will protect taxpayers. However, critics, including two former Democratic legislators, threaten legal action, calling it a “gift” to Browns owners Jimmy and Dee Haslam. Governor DeWine, who previously criticized the debt model, may veto this provision, although his final position remains unclear.Education: Underfunding and vouchersThe budget hits public schools, reducing funding by hundreds of millions compared to the 2021 Fair School Funding Plan, which required an additional $666–800 million. The House's proposal allocated only $226 million, with the Senate adding $100 million, but this is still insufficient, according to Minority Leader Nikki Antonio. “We are stealing from our children,” she said, pointing to the prioritization of vouchers for private schools that will receive $2.5 billion, including a new Education Savings Account (ESA) program. Restrictions on school reserve funds to 40% of previous budgets will force districts to return surplus funds to taxpayers, which Swiny says “limits local control.” Franklin County Court recently declared the EdChoice voucher program unconstitutional, adding tension to the debate.LGBT provisions spark outrageThe budget includes a series of measures targeting the transgender community, which activists say are part of a broader campaign to restrict LGBT rights. The bill enshrines the recognition policy of only two genders — male and female — mirroring President Donald Trump’s executive order. It bans Medicaid coverage for gender-affirming psychological care and halts funding for youth shelters providing such support. More than 25,000 homeless students in Ohio, including LGBT youth, could lose access to housing, said Erin O’Cher from Kaleidoscope Youth Center. Additionally, public libraries will be required to isolate books on sexual orientation or gender identity from minors, which critics see as censorship. “This cuts off access to basic needs,” said O’Cher, calling it “uncontrolled extremism.”Health care and social servicesChanges to Medicaid, including quarterly eligibility checks and funding cuts of 1% in 2026 and 1.5% in 2027, could result in coverage loss for hundreds of thousands of Ohioans, including infants. Restrictions on doula services in six counties with the highest child mortality rates have drawn criticism for reducing progress in maternal health. The budget also cut funding for pediatric cancer research and children's visual health initiatives proposed by DeWine. Meanwhile, the Child Care Choice program received support, providing low-income families with funds for child care.Other controversial provisionsThe budget bans the use of SNAP benefits for purchasing sugary drinks, tightens abortion reporting requirements, and alters the makeup of the teachers’ pension board, reducing elected teacher representatives in favor of political appointees. According to Republican Adam Baird, these changes aim to ensure fund stability, but teachers’ unions say they are an attack on workers’ rights. Additionally, an amendment to the Moddell law makes it easier for the Browns to relocate to Bruck Park by removing legal hurdles for Cleveland, which is fighting to keep the team.What’s next?The budget now lies on Governor DeWine’s desk, who has until June 30 to sign it or veto individual provisions. In 2023, DeWine issued 44 vetoes, notably on tobacco regulations and vaccines, indicating his willingness to oppose the Republican majority. Whether he vetoes funding for the stadium or anti-LGBT measures remains uncertain, but his earlier statements suggest resistance to the debt model for the Browns. The conference committee, which finalized the budget at 1 a.m., left little time for public scrutiny, prompting accusations of opacity. “Budgets are choices,” Swiny said. “And this choice says Ohio cares more about the wealthy than about its people.”As Ohio stands at the crossroads between economic growth and social justice, this budget could be a turning point. For a state aiming to maintain competitiveness but struggling with inequality, DeWine’s decisions will determine whether Ohio becomes an example of progress or remains a battleground of ideologies.

CLEVELAND HEIGHTS, Ohio — Dozens of angry residents of Cleveland Heights have submitted a petition with 4,425 signatures to the Cuyahoga County Election Board, demanding the immediate recall of Mayor Kalila Seren, the city’s first directly elected leader. This move, which concludes weeks of intense signature-gathering campaigns, is the culmination of months of scandals, accusations of a toxic work environment, and charges of antisemitism connected to the mayor’s wife, Natalie McDanel. In a city proud of its diversity and civic engagement, the petition has become not only a challenge to Seren but also a litmus test for the region’s political culture, where tensions between progress and accountability have reached a boiling point. “Every day Kalila Seren remains in office, our city is at risk,” — said Josie Moore, a former city council member and one of the petition organizers, during the delivery of 2,79 sheets of signatures to City Clerk Addie Balester. According to her, the 4,425 collected signatures — 1,500 more than the required 2,900 — reflect the deep disappointment of residents. “We cannot allow the 2026 budget to be shaped under his leadership after the chaos of last December,” — Moore added, referring to the recent failure of Seren’s administration to produce a full budget, which led to a temporary three-month funding freeze — an unprecedented step in the city’s history. The petition, submitted before noon on Monday, is now under review by the Cuyahoga County Board of Elections, which has up to 10 days to verify signatures. “We are working quickly but thoroughly, considering the simultaneous processing of candidate filings,” — said Brent Loller, candidate and petition manager at BOE. If at least 2,900 signatures are validated, the city council will formally notify Seren by June 30, giving him five days to voluntarily resign. In case of refusal, the council will vote on July 7 to include the recall question on the September 9 ballot — coinciding with the previous mayoral election, thus avoiding additional costs for taxpayers. The scandals surrounding Seren began mounting as early as March 2025, when former city administrator Den Hurrigan resigned, accusing the mayor of fostering “undue influence” by McDanel, who, although not an employee of the city hall, allegedly acted as an unofficial boss. In May, the situation worsened after a civil lawsuit filed by former aide Patrick Kostigan, who accused McDanel of antisemitic and homophobic remarks, including offensive text messages calling one official “a lousy, glue factory candidate.” These allegations, supported by complaints to the EEOC and the Ohio Civil Rights Commission, sparked protests and a “loss of confidence” resolution by the city council, passed on June 6 with a vote of 6:1. Seren, a 46-year-old politician who worked as a county council advisor and served on the city council for six years before being elected mayor in 2021, dismisses the accusations as “a political maneuver based on misinformation.” In a Monday press release, he stated: “I respect citizens’ right to petition, but this is not about my work or ethics, but about the ambitions of those seeking to destabilize the city.” Seren, who failed to gather enough signatures (only 303 of the required 342) to run in the 2025 elections, accused opponents of “exploiting biases” and pledged to serve until the end of his term, January 1, 2026, unless removed. However, not everyone in Cleveland Heights supports the petition. Drew Gertzig, a local resident and Seren supporter, called the recall campaign a “futile waste of time” and accused its organizers of inciting conflict. “They themselves created chaos, and now they blame the mayor,” he said, citing Seren’s projects such as the renovation of Cain Park and the Tudor Fairmont update. Gertzig also expressed concern about the racial undertones of the campaign, noting that Seren, the city’s first Black mayor, faces “a racist system.” Moore firmly rejected these accusations, emphasizing the diversity among the petition organizers: “Our signatures are collected from people of all races and religions. This is not about race but about competence.” According to sources within the city council, the conflicts surrounding Seren have worsened the functioning of the city hall, where 12 department heads have resigned over his 3.5-year term, including three city administrators and several financial directors. In December 2024, the incident with McDanel, caught on camera when she allegedly yelled and cursed at employees, further fueled accusations of creating a toxic work environment. Although 17 city employees signed a letter denying these claims, calling them “exaggerations for political purposes,” complaints to the EEOC and a lawsuit by Kostigan reveal a deep fissure. For Cleveland Heights, a city of 45,000 known for its progressive culture and integration, this crisis is a test. Five candidates — from Vice President Davida Russell to lawyer Lori Kingsley Hong — are vying for the mayoral seat in the September 9 election, promising to restore trust. But the recall petition, if successful, could change the course of events, leaving the council to appoint an interim mayor until January 2026. “We want the new mayor to start with a clean slate,” — Moore said, highlighting the need for stability. While the Election Board verifies signatures and the community prepares for a potential vote, Cleveland Heights stands at a crossroads. Whether this petition will serve as a catalyst for change or deepen divisions in the city depends on the coming weeks. But one thing is clear: in a city proud of its civic activism, the voice of the people rings louder than ever.

On Friday, the Los Angeles Dodgers, freshly crowned World Series champions, took a decisive step by announcing a donation of $1 million to support immigrant families affected by the two-week raids conducted by the federal immigration service in Southern California. This initiative, reinforced through partnerships with the California Community Foundation, the Los Angeles County Federation of Labor, and other local organizations, was a response to the growing pressure from fans and community leaders demanding the team — a city symbol with a 40% Latin American fan base — to take a clear stand amid a wave of fear sweeping the region. "What is happening in Los Angeles has touched the hearts of thousands, and we have heard calls to take a leading role," said Dodgers President Stan Kasten in a carefully worded press release, avoiding direct political statements but clearly signaling support for the immigrant community. The team promised that this is just the beginning: additional initiatives will be announced soon to provide families with food, basic needs, and psychological support. The announcement came amid a tense situation that developed the day before, when the Dodgers found themselves at the center of a confrontation with federal authorities. On Thursday morning, dozens of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents in tactical gear and with covered faces gathered in the parking lot outside Entrance E of Dodger Stadium, reportedly to process those detained during raids in neighboring districts. The team firmly denied agents access to the stadium premises, sparking a wave of support from protesters carrying signs like "ICE out of Los Angeles." ICE refuted the presence of its agents, and the Department of Homeland Security stated that the vehicle belonged to Customs and was there "short-term" without law enforcement objectives. However, evidence from local activists, including photos of license plates matching those used in raids in Hollywood, cast doubt on these claims. This incident culminated weeks of tension when ICE raids, supported by the deployment of 4,100 California National Guard troops and 700 U.S. Marines on orders from President Donald Trump, sowed panic in immigrant communities in Los Angeles. According to ICE, over 66,000 people were arrested during the first 100 days of Trump's second term, making it the "largest deportation operation in U.S. history" as promised during the campaign. In Los Angeles, where 36% of the population are immigrants, these actions triggered mass protests, economic upheaval, and calls for local institutions, including the Dodgers, to act. For the Dodgers, whose history is closely tied to the Latino community since the "Fernandomania" era of the 1980s, when Mexican pitcher Fernando Valenzuela became an icon, silence was not just impossible — it was perceived as a betrayal. Congressman Jimmy Gomez, representing districts in Los Angeles, sharply criticized the team on social media Friday morning: "Silence is a choice, and in a city where nearly 40% of Dodgers fans are Latin American, that is an insult." Player Kike Hernández, a Puerto Rican native, previously expressed outrage over the raids, writing on Instagram: "I can't stand when our community is degraded, profiled, and torn apart." Legendary commentator Jaime Jarrín, who broadcast Dodgers games in Spanish for 63 years, added, "Immigration is part of American history, and tearing families apart is inhumane." The Dodgers' response was not only financial. The team, which in January had already collaborated with the city to help fire victims in California, used its influence to call on other organizations to follow their lead. Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass, who previously described the raids as an "attack on the city's economy," expressed gratitude: "These weeks have brought fear to every neighborhood, but we will not turn away from each other. The Dodgers have shown what it means to be part of Los Angeles." According to sources close to the city government, the city plans to establish a centralized fund to distribute aid, which could be joined by other sports franchises, such as LAFC and Angel City FC, which have already expressed solidarity. However, not everyone is satisfied. Over 50 community, religious, and union leaders, including PICO California and LA Voice, sent a letter to Dodgers owner Mark Walter demanding not only financial support but also a public condemnation of the raids and guarantees that the team’s property will never be used for immigration operations. "Money is a step, but dignity requires more," stated Pastor Zak Huber of LA Voice. Activists also point to the Dodgers' ambiguous stance: in March, the team accepted an invitation from Trump to the White House after winning the World Series, which drew criticism from some fans. For Los Angeles, a city where immigrants sew uniforms, clean stadium seats, and line up for tickets to support their heroes, the Dodgers' actions are more than just a donation. It is a signal that the team hears the voices of its community. But while protests continue and federal agents patrol the streets, the question remains open: will this million-dollar gesture be the start of a broader fight for justice, or just a symbolic act amid turbulent waters of fear? At Dodger Stadium, where Jackie Robinson and Fernando Valenzuela once broke barriers, the answer may still be ahead.

COLUMBUS, Ohio — In Ohio, where soaring real estate prices are choking homeowners, Republican lawmakers have introduced an ambitious plan promising $3.5 billion in tax relief — the largest tax cut in the state's history. Bill H.B. 335, proposed by Representatives David Thomas and Bill Romer, is positioned as a lifeline for people like Debra Weigandt from Akron, whose taxes rose 30% after the latest property reassessment. However, behind this promise lies a painful compromise: schools already suffering from underfunding could lose $1.5 billion, jeopardizing education for thousands of children. "It's not just a tax hike; it's felt like a financial heart attack," said Ed Livenhua, a resident of Lake County, whose tax bill sharply increased last summer. Similar stories are heard across Ohio, where the post-pandemic real estate boom has led to an average property value increase of 30–37% in counties like Butler, Montgomery, and Green. For many homeowners, especially retirees and middle-income families, these increases have become an unbearable burden, prompting legislators to act. H.B. 335, known as the "Immediate Property Tax Relief Act," offers a radical solution: abolishing the so-called "internal tax" — a mechanism that allows school districts to automatically receive more revenue as property values increase. "We want property owners to feel real relief, not see their taxes rise with the market," said Thomas, a former auditor of Ashtabula County, whom the Republican leadership has chosen to champion the reform. He estimates that the average homeowner will save $850 annually if their home is assessed at the median value. The Cost of Relief But for school districts relying on property taxes for 50% of their budgets, H.B. 335 is a financial disaster. Charles Smialek, superintendent of Parma City Schools, called the bill "a blow to the very heart of education." He said that losing $1.5 billion would leave schools without resources to sustain basic services. "How can we educate children when we have to cut teachers, close classrooms, and cancel sports and arts?" he asked. Parma, like many other districts, is already fighting to survive. Since 2011, the district has not received new revenue from local taxes, having failed seven referenda attempts since 2018. "We have reached our limit," Smialek said. "This bill won't just complicate our work; it will make it impossible." According to Ohio Department of Education data, 486 of the state's 609 school districts have reserves exceeding the proposed 30% of their annual budgets and would be required to return those funds to taxpayers if H.B. 335 becomes law. For example, Columbus City Schools would need to find a way to allocate $139.5 million to comply with the new rules. Republicans like Romer argue that schools can save money by consolidating services or merging with other districts. "We want to start serious conversations about efficiency," he said, hinting at possible school district mergers in rural areas. However, critics, including Democratic representative Braid Rose Swini, call this a "sham reform" that only provides temporary relief for homeowners while creating a long-term crisis for education. "This is a one-time transfer of funds that doesn't address systemic problems," Swini noted. The Broader Context H.B. 335 is part of a broader fight over tax reform in Ohio, where the school funding system—deemed unconstitutional by the state's Supreme Court in 1997—still relies heavily on local property taxes. About 611 school districts in the state collected $13 billion in property taxes in 2023–2024, but this system perpetuates inequality: wealthy districts thrive, while poorer districts like Parma struggle to make ends meet. The bipartisan Fair School Funding Plan, adopted in 2021, aimed to address this, but its implementation is slowed by a $1.8 billion shortfall needed for full funding. Meanwhile, pressure on lawmakers is mounting. The civic group Citizens for Property Tax Reform has gathered 1,800 signatures to amend the constitution to fully abolish property taxes, which could devastate funding for schools, libraries, and local services. "This is our last resort," said group spokeswoman Bet Blackmar. "We, especially seniors, can't afford to pay anymore." Although experts like Senator Bill Blesing warn that abolishing property taxes could lead to a "loss of $22 billion in revenue," the initiative reflects deep voter frustration. The Political Game H.B. 335, currently under consideration in the Ohio Senate, is just one of 19 property tax bills floating around, indicating a political fever pitch around this issue. House Speaker Matt Huffman called the reform "dramatic and necessary," but acknowledged that a compromise with the Senate, which increased the reserve limit for schools to 50%, would be challenging. Governor Mike DeWine, whose budget doesn't include such radical changes, expressed caution, stating that "education is the state's primary responsibility." For homeowners like Weigandt, who feels that "everything is getting more expensive," the promise of $3.5 billion in relief sounds like a lifesaver. But for teachers, students, and parents witnessing their schools lose resources, it sounds like a verdict. As Ohio balances between tax relief for payers and protecting education, one question remains unanswered: can the state afford to sacrifice the future of its children for immediate relief?

COLUMBUS, Ohio — On Tuesday, Ohio's Senate approved a two-year state budget totaling $60 billion, which sparked fierce debate over its controversial priorities: a generous $600 million grant for building a new stadium for the Cleveland Browns, significant tax cuts for the state's wealthiest residents, and modest increases in funding for public schools. This document, which will reach $200 billion after federal funds are included, reveals a deep split in political views on where Ohio's resources should be directed. Bill No. 96, largely approved along party lines (23–10), became a battleground between ambitious economic projects and the needs of education and social programs that have been overshadowed.Stadium at taxpayers' expenseOne of the loudest points in the budget was the allocation of $600 million for a new Cleveland Browns stadium in the suburb of Berea. Unlike the House of Representatives' proposal, which involved issuing bonds for this amount with payments reaching $1 billion in interest, the Senate chose a different route. The funds will be taken from the state's Unclaimed Funds Reserve — $4.8 billion, including forgotten bank accounts, rental deposits, or unused insurance policies. "It's a sensible way to avoid debt burden," — said Senator Jerry Cirino, head of the Finance Committee, arguing that the investment will pay off through taxes from the new stadium.However, critics, including Senate Minority Leader Nikki Antonio, call this decision a "blatant example of misplaced priorities." "If we can find $600 million for a football stadium, why can't we find funds for our schools?" Antonio asked at a press conference, noting that the budget only partially fulfills the needs of the 2021 Fair School Funding Plan (FSFP). Democrats submitted 423 amendments to the budget, including one to cancel stadium funding, but their proposals did not garner support in the Senate, where Republicans hold a supermajority of 24–9.[](https://ohiocapitaljournal.com/2025/05/21/ohio-senate-democrats-hope-to-fully-fund-public-schools-not-fund-browns-stadium-in-state-budget/)Governor Mike DeWine, who previously opposed the stadium financing debt model, expressed cautious optimism about the Senate's proposal but did not confirm whether he would sign the budget without changes. Insiders suggest that DeWine may exercise his veto power on specific articles if he believes the project overburdens the state budget.Education: promises unfulfilledEducation became another battleground. The Senate's budget proposes an additional $100 million for public schools compared to the House proposal, bringing the total increase to $550 million. However, this only partially meets the needs of the FSFP, which, according to experts, requires between $666 million and $800 million for full funding. "We are approaching fair funding, but it's not enough," — Antonio said, pointing out that many schools, especially in poorer districts, continue to rely on local property taxes, which the Ohio Supreme Court declared unconstitutional back in the early 2000s.The Senate also made changes to the "guarantee" funding system by abolishing mechanisms that protected schools from cuts if student numbers decrease. Instead, additional funds will only be allocated to districts with high academic performance or those demonstrating growth. This decision faced criticism from teachers' unions, who argue it punishes schools in deprimed regions. "It's like changing the rules in the middle of the game," — Melissa Cropper of the Ohio Federation of Teachers said.Moreover, the budget increased the reserve fund limit for schools to 50% of their annual operating budget, allowing districts to hold more funds for capital projects such as constructing new schools. However, this also means surpluses will be returned to taxpayers, complicating long-term planning for schools.Tax breaks for the wealthyAnother contentious point is the introduction of a flat income tax rate of 2.75%, eliminating the higher rate of 3.5% for those earning over $100,000. It is estimated to result in a loss of $1.1 billion from the state's total revenue. Senator Cirino defends this move, stating that tax cuts will stimulate economic growth and attract wealthy residents to Ohio. "States with a flat tax thrive," — he said, citing examples from other states.However, critics, including Policy Matters Ohio, refer to this as a "gift to the wealthiest at the expense of the middle class." The tax cuts coincide with cuts to Medicaid, libraries, lead poisoning programs, and food banks, disproportionately affecting low-income residents. "Librarians and teachers will pay the same tax rate as professional athletes," — Bailey Williams of Policy Matters Ohio noted.Conditional scholarshipsAmong the positive aspects is the expansion of the governor's merit-based scholarship, which will now provide $20,000 to the top 2% of high school graduates for college education in Ohio. However, there is a condition: recipients must remain in the state for three years after graduation or else they will have to return the funds. According to Cirino, this proposal aims to retain talent in Ohio, but critics argue it may restrict young people's freedom of choice.Looking to the futureThe budget, which must be finalized by June 30, is now transferred to the conference committee, where the Senate and House of Representatives will attempt to reconcile their differences. Governor DeWine, known for his tendency to veto individual articles, will oversee the process. For many Ohio residents, especially in Cleveland, the budget has become a symbol of a broader struggle: between economic ambitions supporting projects like the Browns Stadium and urgent needs for education and social services.“This is a budget that favors football fields over classrooms,” — summed up Antonio, standing in front of the Ohio State Capitol. As Ohio prepares for the economic growth promised by stadium supporters, many are asking: at what cost?

WASHINGTON — On Saturday, June 14, 2025, Constitution Avenue in Washington became the stage for a grand celebration of the 250th anniversary of the U.S. Army, where soldiers marched to the rhythm of drums and helicopter engines, tanks rumbled, and paratroopers from the "Golden Knights" jumped from the sky. The parade, coinciding with President Donald Trump’s 79th birthday, was not only a demonstration of military strength but also an arena of political passions, as the festivities were accompanied by protests and concerns regarding their cost and impact on the city.Under a periodic downpour, thousands of spectators gathered to see a retrospective of the army—from uniforms of the First World War to modern drones and robot dogs. President Trump took an oath from 250 new recruits, welcoming them to a “wonderful life” in the ranks of the army. But the event also served as a lightning rod for tensions, from accusations of militarism to worries about financial repercussions.Chronology of GloryThe parade opened with a performance by the “Old Guard”—an infantry regiment founded in 1784. Following them appeared the “Golden Knights,” who made a descent from the Ellipse. Each part of the parade told a story of an era:World Wars I and II: Soldiers of the 82nd Airborne Division marched in 1917 uniforms, and WWII jeeps recalled the “All-Americans.”Vietnam War: Huey helicopters flew over soldiers in 1960s uniforms.Gulf War: “Chocolate chip” camouflage and Bradley vehicles highlighted the 1990s era.Modern times: M1 Abrams tanks, HIMARS systems, and robot dogs showcased technological prowess.The parade concluded with speeches by Vice President Jake D. Vance and Trump, after which the crowd sang “Happy Birthday.” Fireworks lit up the night, though the flyover by the “Thunderbirds” was canceled due to weather.Shadow of ControversiesThe celebration, estimated at $38 million, sparked outrage among critics who called it wasteful. “No Kings” protests gathered hundreds of people, accusing Trump of authoritarian ambitions. Washington residents worried about roads, recalling damages from 2019. The military assured that rubber tracks were used, but skepticism remained.Global ResonanceThe presence of HIMARS and Bradley vehicles emphasized support for Ukraine. The West closely watched in Beijing and Moscow, where it was seen as a display of strength. For veterans like John Carter, the parade was a moment of pride, but for others — a warning sign.Future in MarchWhile fireworks lit up the sky, Washington remained a city of contrasts — pride and anxieties. The parade reflected the tension: between unity and division, tradition and protest. Its echoes will resonate far beyond Constitution Avenue.

TEHRAN/JERUSALEM — On Friday at dawn, the skies over Tehran were lit by explosions as Israel launched a series of “preemptive” airstrikes on Iranian nuclear and military facilities, sharply escalating tensions in the region and threatening US diplomatic efforts regarding the nuclear deal with Iran. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, announcing an operation titled “Rising Lion,” called the strikes necessary to “eliminate the existential threat” posed by Iran. In response, Iran promised “severe retaliation,” and the world held its breath, fearing an escalation that could engulf the entire Middle East. “We struck the very heart of Iran’s nuclear program,” Netanyahu said in a video address released early Friday morning. “We attacked the main enrichment complex in Natanz, leading nuclear scientists, and Iran’s ballistic missile program.” According to him, the operation will take “as many days as necessary” to neutralize what he called a “clear and immediate threat to Israel’s survival.” Iranian state television confirmed explosions in Tehran, reporting the death of several high-ranking officials, including IRGC Commander Major General Hossein Salami and two nuclear scientists, Fereydoun Abbasi and Mohammad Mehti Tehranchi. In a statement, Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei condemned Israel for “criminal aggression,” promising “severe punishment.” Escalation on the brink of war The attack marked the culmination of years of hostility between Israel and Iran, which has intensified due to Tehran’s accelerating nuclear program. According to the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Iran recently refused to cooperate with inspectors, leading to a rare resolution of condemnation by the agency’s Board of Governors. Israel, which has long alleged that Iran is secretly developing nuclear weapons, cites intelligence indicating Tehran could produce a bomb “within months or even a year.” The strikes on Natanz — a key uranium enrichment site — and military bases in Tehran caused chaos. Witnesses in Iran’s capital reported red skies, aircraft sounds, and sirens. Residential neighborhoods were damaged, and state media reported civilian casualties, including children. Iran closed its main Imam Khomeini Airport and activated its air defense systems. In Israel, preparations for a possible response included declaring a state of emergency. Schools were closed, mass gatherings prohibited, and sirens sounded in Tel Aviv and Jerusalem. According to the IDF, Iran has already launched over 100 drones in response, and the country is preparing for missile strikes. “We expect a heavy attack but are ready to defend,” said Israeli Defense Minister Yoav Gallant. Diplomacy under attack The strikes dealt a blow to US President Donald Trump’s efforts to negotiate a new nuclear accord with Iran. Talks, scheduled for Sunday in Oman, had already been fragile due to US demands that Iran halt uranium enrichment entirely. Trump, who publicly expressed optimism about the deal on Thursday, insisted that Israel should refrain from attack. “We are close to an agreement,” he wrote on Truth Social. “Iran could become a great country, but first it must give up nuclear weapons.” However, Netanyahu, skeptical of diplomacy with Iran, ignored Washington’s calls. Insiders in Jerusalem report that the prime minister sees a unique window of opportunity: Iran is weakened by sanctions, losing regional allies like Hezbollah and the Assad regime in Syria, and has recently suffered Israeli strikes against its military infrastructure. “Netanyahu believes now or never,” noted Israeli analyst Yossi Melman. The US, while providing military support to Israel, distanced itself from the operation. Secretary of State Mark Rubio emphasized that the strikes were an “ unilateral action” by Israel and warned Iran against attacking American interests. “Our priority is to protect our forces in the region,” he said. According to Pentagon sources, the US recently evacuated some personnel from Iraq and other Central Command countries amid fears of escalation. Regional tinderbox The attack provoked sharp reactions across the region. Oman, acting as a mediator in US-Iran talks, accused Israel of “undermining regional security.” Iran’s Defense Minister Aziz Nasserzadeh stated that Tehran is prepared to attack US bases in the region if the US becomes involved. “All their bases are within our reach,” he said, raising the stakes in an already tense situation. Experts warn that the strikes could trigger a wider conflict. “This is not just Israel vs. Iran,” said Jason Brodsky of United Against Nuclear Iran. “It could draw in Hezbollah, Houthi rebels, Iraq, and even Syria.” The strikes also increased domestic pressure on Netanyahu, who faces corruption charges and protests over the Gaza war. Some analysts believe the attack is partly aimed at diverting attention from internal issues. What’s next? As Tehran considers its response, global markets reacted with a sharp rise in oil prices — up 12% within hours of the strikes. In Washington, Congress is divided: Republicans like Senator Tom Cotton expressed support for Israel, whereas Democrats, including Senator Chris Murphy, called the attack a “disaster,” blaming Trump and Netanyahu for escalation. For ordinary Iranians and Israelis hiding from sirens and explosions, the strikes serve as a stark reminder of the region’s fragility. “I saw the sky turn red,” recounts Mahtab, a resident of northern Tehran. “We’re afraid this is just the beginning.” In Tel Aviv, Israelis rushed to shelters, preparing for the worst. As Israel and Iran stand on the brink of war and diplomacy hangs by a thread, one question remains unanswered: can the region avoid catastrophe, or will this “preemptive” strike ignite the Middle East into wider conflict?